Facebook Badge

Saturday, October 29, 2011

ElectSharon4Seniors Ward2_CitySt.Paul_MN

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=429 Sharon mustChallenge Constitutionality of City St.Paul's Ponzi Scheme to Assessments to Steal your Property's























Quantcast


Sharon Anderson · St. Paul Central


Shame on Schanno , who Affiant VA Widow Sharon Scarrella Anderson aka Peterson_Chergosky alleges Ms Schanno is making FALSE Statement to Ruin Sharons Credit and to malign Sharons Reputation etc. File no 495722 1988 When the Lesbian Judge KIathleen Gearin "kicked out the Disabled Anderson" Silver StarMarine suffering from Major PSTD and then trying to force $110,000.00 hundred and ten thousand dollars to cover up Major RealEstate Ponzi Schemes by the City St.Paul, County Ramsey. Sharon alleges that Ms. Schanno who has a Daughter apparantly never Married?
request that Ms Schanno disclose if Schanno ever Married. Sharon verily alleges that Ms. Schanno has never Voted in St.Paul Has never attended a Council Hearing and is a Mole_Wringer for the REpublican Party. Currently Sharon4Seniors is duly concerned for Property Homeowners... and must Challenge certain Statutes as Unconstitutionally Vague, Arbitrary re: Canvass Board and Assessments https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=429

that the St.Paul City Council has illegally for years used to Condemn and "take" our propertys Ms. Schanno put your 400 hundred thousand Condo at 256 Spring St. purschased from Rottlund Inc (sp) and your JC Aviation in the Flood Plaine Downtown St.Paul, and legally file your Distorted Ramblings now published re: Times vs. Sullivan to Force a Grand Jury to investigate. Sharon is challanging Constitutionality to force the State Attorney General to defend the Law's www.barden4ag.com










Quantcast




Cynthia Schanno · · Top Commenter · Saint Paul, Minnesota

In your never ending effort to distort or should I say misinterpreted the facts...
The statute reads a city council candidate must live within the ward. It is common knowledge Ms. Anderson (a perpetual candidate) DOES NOT. The shame here is when you talk with county and/or city officials “they” state it is not their responsibility to verify or enforce the rules. My question then was “Well who is responsible?”.
The irony here is it is up to a challenging candidate and/or citizen to file a formal complaint, meaning the burden once again falls to the tax payers and/or a candidate who must to incur the time and cost to bring forward a formal complaint. This seems utterly asinine and frankly it is outrageous to me and I am simply pointing out the facts so the public is aware.
Our city council representatives state it is important to hold a fair race. Mr. Thune knows Sharon does not live in the ward, most everyone knows that… allowing Sharon to stay on the ballot makes a mockery of our system and our “new” electoral process, which “everyone” voted for but nobody knows how it works.
You are questioning my motive rather than bring light to the facts… If you had bothered to pick up the phone and ask me direct the motive behind the press release maybe then you would have write the story or communicated the effort correctly. Sorry Pioneer Press you did it again. Now, I dare ask, who is playing politics?











  • Sharon Anderson · St. Paul Central

    Put your Money where your Mouth is and if your such a concern citizen file with the OAH or Ramsey Co. Attorney re: Criminal Charges mandate Grand Jury Proceeings. www.sharon4Council.blogspot.com Ms Schanno your wilful neglience to investigate re: www.sharon4anderson.org exploiting Seniors, Disabled,Vunerable Adults is pervase/fatal





Subscribe! Feed RSS Subscribe Feed

SEARCH THIS BLOG RECENT POSTS



ARCHIVES







Schanno wants Sharon Anderson off the ballot











Now is when things get rough, tough and … and … (dare we say it? yes we dare) … even snippy in St. Paul City Council races. And by rough, tough and snippy, the Scoop doesn’t just mean, “Don’t vote for my competitor.”


The Scoop means… “don’t allow my competitor on the ballot.”


That’s the tactic in the downtown / West End corner known as Ward 2, where one candidate is trying to get a second candidate booted out of the election even before Election Day, and blaming a third candidate — the incumbent city council member — that she’s even made it this far.


Confused? Here’s how it works:


Perennial candidate Sharon Anderson is running for election to the City Council in Ward 2, which would lead one to surmise that she actually lives in or around downtown or somewhere near West Seventh Street. Wrong, says fellow Ward 2 candidate Cynthia Schanno.


Anderson uses both her Summit Avenue address and a P.O. Box in her election filings, notes Schanno, even though Anderson lost her home in a tax dispute in 1988. Anderson apparently lives on the East Side, or did so when she videotaped this YouTube message in 2009: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgDuL6Vf6Rw


Of the video, Anderson said: “That doesn’t prove anything. I’ve got 13 pieces of property.”


“My legal residence is 1058 Summit Avenue,” Anderson told the Scoop on Friday. “She’s trying to make a name for herself. She emailed me. She has published this on her website saying I’m not a viable candidate. Well, then make a complaint. If she’s going to be publishing false statements, the election law is you have to file a complaint with the office of administrative hearings. … Why doesn’t she sue me? Why doesn’t she file a legal complaint?”


The Scoop asked Anderson: “Where do you live, Sharon?”


To which Anderson responded: “It doesn’t matter. I have properties up in Itasca, I have properties up in Aitkin … ”


To which the Scoop interrupted: “Do you have property in Ward 2?”


To which Anderson responded: “I own 1058 Summit Avenue, with my dead tenants in common. … I’m not going to let a house go. The house was paid for. … Until she’s filed a valid complaint, I’m going to ignore her. … I could be living in my car, for all she knows.”


Anderson, who maintains she has been “reduced to poverty,” previously told the Scoop that she has to ask for rides from friends to the Dorothy Day Center in downtown St. Paul for meals. It stands to reason she might not rest her head at night in downtown proper. But could she really live… outside the ward? (Cue suspenseful music here…)


So, if Schanno’s allegations are true, who’s fault is it that Anderson’s name remains on the ballot? Clearly, it’s Council Member’s Dave Thune’s fault.


Wait. Hold up. Remind the tape. What?!


Schanno writes on her website, referring to herself in the third person: “Schanno alleged that incumbent Dave Thune knows Anderson is not eligible to be on the ballot but has said and done nothing because the situation benefits him.”


How could that be? Schanno’s press release doesn’t explain that point in detail, but hey, the Scoop surmises, it could be like this: Schanno and Anderson are the only women on the Ward 2 ballot. Together, they’d split the female vote faster than you can say “Bachmann vs. Palin.”


Furthermore, Anderson is a self-described Republican (though judging by previous GOP attempts to get her booted from previous elections, the party has no deep affection for her.) Schanno is at least a bit right of center, so the two appear to share some political space, at least on paper.


Schanno writes: “Anderson can siphon off a few hundred votes when voters mistake her for a more well known woman by the same name.”


Well, well. Let the battle be unjoined!

Thursday, October 20, 2011

Water Meter REMOVAL Item 18 Radio Frequency Harmful

City Council

http://stpaul.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=37&clip_id=2167#.TqBMzZmoOMI.blogger
















City Council

Tuesday, October 18, 2011

Candidate SharonWard2_Demands GrandJury vs. DaveThune

http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/magner-v-gallagher/






Mon. 17Oct2011

http://www.thevoterguide.org/v/vote411/race-detail.do?id=220627490&sfr=1314342128207







My Ballot Thanks to St.Paul League MN Voters Equal online Participation.











St. Paul City Council Ward 2

















Add to Comparison


Choose










To the Above named: Specifically Ramsey Co. Attorney John Choi former St.Paul City Attorney_______ re: Election Law Criminal Complaints and Constitutional Challenge of MS211B http://www.sos.state.mn.us/index.aspx?page=135 ELECTION LAWS delegated to http://www.oah.state.mn.us/ "denial due process" Jury Trials to let the Voting/Taxpaying Publc to be fully informed.?


http://www.sos.state.mn.us/index.aspx?page=637
















Sharon Anderson - Ward 2 - YouTube










www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEUxxM3Vmc4Mar 31, 2007 - 3 min - Uploaded by StPaulEDemocracy



Joyce and Sharon WheelChair Buddy's


AFFIDAVIT OF SHARON ANDERSON PURSUANT TO PENALITYS OF PERJURY.






2011 Minnesota Statutes COUNT I UCC 336.1 Duress


Has the City St.Paul Council Dave Thune et al created heinous "Duress" on the Citizenery by his Council_Chair HRA?

Further Illegal "Code Violations" NOT SIGNED BY CITY ATTORNEY 4 PROSECUTION AND WITHOUT LONG FORM COMPLAINTS.?

a. Stealing Sharons Car, Drivers License,Trespass on Private Property, Treason to deny State and Federal Laws Constutional Guarantees YES



Has the City Attorney Gerald Henderickson exceeded his executive Jurisdiction/Authority to even sit at the Council Table while Hearings are Held, Illegal Ratifications, without "due process" or Long Form Complaints. YES


Bills of lading, 336.7-502



Commercial Code, supplementary principles, 336.1-103



Complementary and alternative health care practitioners, 146A.08



Criminal liability, effect on, 609.08



Documents of title, 336.7-502



Fraudulent

Negotiable instruments, 336.3-202, 336.3-305



Voting, obstructing or preventing, 211B.07



Vulnerable adults, financial exploitation, 609.2335, 626.5572



Warehouse receipts, 336.7-502

transfers,
513.50





Recent History





336.1-103 MS 2002 [Repealed, 2004 c 162 art 1 s 26]

336.1-103 CONSTRUCTION OF UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE TO PROMOTE ITS PURPOSES AND POLICIES; APPLICABILITY OF SUPPLEMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF LAW.



(a) The Uniform Commercial Code must be liberally construed and applied to promote its underlying purposes and policies, which are:



(1) to simplify, clarify, and modernize the law governing commercial transactions;



(2) to permit the continued expansion of commercial practices through custom, usage, and agreement of the parties; and



(3) to make uniform the law among the various jurisdictions.



(b) Unless displaced by the particular provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code, the principles of law and equity, including the law merchant and the law relative to capacity to contract, principal and agent, estoppel, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake, bankruptcy, and other validating or invalidating cause supplement its provisions.



COUNT II Constutionality MS211B Fair Campaign Act.


Minnesota Statutes Chapter 211B is the Minnesota Fair Campaign Practices Act and it applies to candidates for federal, statewide, legislative, judicial or local office including special districts, school districts, townships, home rule cities, charter cities, statutory cities, and counties. It also applies to committees acting to influence the nomination, election, or defeat of a candidate or to promote or defeat a ballot question.



The Minnesota Campaign Manual contains Minnesota Statutes Chapter 211B plus other related campaign information.



The Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) has jurisdiction over Chapter 211B and hears all complaints related to to Chapter 211B. See OAH's Fair Campaign Hearing Process webpage for information about the complaint process and past decisions which may provide guidance. The phone number for OAH is 651-361-7900.





Links to selected OAH determinations:








Magner v. Gallagher (relisted after the 9/26 and 10/7 Conferences)



Docket: 10-1032



Issue(s): (1) Whether disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act; and, if so (2) what test should be used to analyze them.



Certiorari stage documents:








Name: Louise Seeba " also Assist City Attry" re: SEPARATION OF POWERS/JURISDICTION/AUTHORITY"
Office: School Board
Legal Residential Address: 1399 Sheldon St St Paul MN 55108
Campaign Contact Information:
www.seebaforschoolboard.org
Email: louiseseeba@gmail.com Phone: 651-335-4263
to be held November 8





https://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/statutes/?id=336.1-103&year=2011
A general election will be held on Tuesday, November 8. On that day, residents of St. Paul can cast a ballot for the above city and school-district officials. Various different elections will be open to other residents of Ramsey County.



Most questions about the election can be answered by following these links:








Click here: League of Women Voters St. Paul











City Council Ward 2 Tuesday, October 18
6:30 to 8
:00 p.m.
401 Concord Street
Saint Paul, MN 55107-2499
(651) 228-0506
Our Lady of Guadalupe Social Hall
401 Concord St
St. Paul, MN 55107
Ami Wazlawik
Forum Coordinator - League of Women Voters St. Paul



Ward 2


Name: Sharon Anderson
Office: City Council
Candidate Residence Address: 1058 Summit Ave / PO Box 4384 St Paul MN 55104
Campaign Contact Information:
Phone: 651-776-5835
Website: www.sharon4council.blogspot.com
Email: sharon4anderson@aol.com



Name: Dave Thune
Office: City Council
Candidate Residence Address: 26 Irvine Park St Paul MN 55102
Campaign Contact Information:
Phone: 651-227-2511
Website: www.davethune.com
Email: thune@comcast.net



Name: Jim Ivey
Office: City Council
Candidate Residence Address: 300 Wall St #708 St Paul MN 55101
Campaign Contact Information:
Phone: 651-665-0224
Website: www.iveyforsaintpaul.org
Email: jim@iveyforsaintpaul.org



Name: Bill Hosko
Office: City Council
Candidate Residence Address: 111 Kellogg Blvd St Paul MN 55101
Campaign Contact Information:
Phone: 763-656-8624
Website: www.billhosko.org
Email: BillHosko@yahoo.com



Name: Cynthia P Schanno
Office: City Council
Candidate Residence Address: 256 Spring St St Paul MN 55102
Campaign Contact Information:
Phone:
Website: www.voteschanno.com
Email: cynthia@voteschanno.com



THEREFORE: RESIGNATIONS OF DAVE THUNE_CITY ATTORNEYS GERALD HENDERICKSON_LOUISE SEEBA FOR CAUSE, AND OR GRAND JURY INVESTIGATIONS INTO MS 609.43
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower,
www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
<
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
This site is for educational purposes only, dedicated to promoting political speech protected by the First Amendment. As you can imagine, we receive thousands of stories and requests for input from consumers all across the country. Given the sheer volume, we cannot respond to all inquiries. This site is dedicated to serving and protecting homeowners and restoring the integrity of our court systems. This site is for educational purposes only. The purposes of this website is to share information and knowledge and to advance fundamental Constitutional rights especially the First Amendment.


Saturday, October 15, 2011

Frederick Douglass and the Movement for Liberation

ElectSharonWard2 Truthtotell.org_AudioUSSC:10-1032_Magner





Edited Audio of today's forum with St. Paul's Ward 2 Council Candidates is here: (or click on Title below): http://bit.ly/Ward2StPaulForum. Candidates present were: DAVE THUNE – incumbent. Chair, St. Paul HRA. DFL-endorsed; JIM IVEY – software developer residing and working in Lowertown. Endorsed by the Green Party of St. Paul and TakeActionMN; BILL HOSKO – Artist and picture-framer in downtown St. Paul. Ran against Thune in 2007. Independent; CYNTHIA SCHANNO – aircraft broker at Holman Airfield. Independent; SHARON ANDERSON – perennial candidate in Ward 2. Insists she still owns a house at 1058 Summit Ave lost decades ago in a tax forfeiture. Retired. Republican.




www.truthtotell.org
The St. Paul City Council and School Board elections will garner much attention – not only for the large number of candidates challenging incumbents, but as a test for the city’s and county election bureau’s implementation of the new voter-approved Ranked Choice Voting system, which eliminated the t...



· · · October 10


"Sharon, I must ask you to remove me from regular mailings, please. However, enjoyed having you on the show. Best wishes,"

Andy " Our you covertly covering up the LandLords vs. CitySt.Paul,MN_Magner who lives in StillWater et al USSC:10-1032




Conor McEvily Petition of the Day


Posted Fri, May 20th, 2011 10:20 am



Petition of the day



Todayâ's petition of the day is:


Magner v. Gallagher


Docket: 10-1032
Issue(s): (1) Whether disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act; and, if so (2) what test should be used to analyze them.


Certiorari stage documents:




Posted in Magner v. Gallagher








~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Andy Driscoll, Producer/Host
TruthToTell-9AM Mondays-KFAI-FM 90.3/106.7

Streamed Live at KFAI.org
651-293-9039 / 651-492-2221 (cell)
andydriscoll@TruthToTell.org

TTT’s ANDY DRISCOLL and MICHELLE ALIMORADI conduct a conversation among these five candidates.


DAVE THUNE – incumbent. An artist (he owns a West 7th St. gallery and coffee shop) and West End community activist, he’s completing his second term of this new round after previously serving eight years through the 1990’s. (Disclosure: your writer challenged Dave Thune in 1993) He lives in Irvine Park and is DFL-endorsed.


JIM IVEY – is a software developer with his wife, residing and working in Lowertown St. Paul for the last ten years. Among his interests: Urban gardening and curling. Endorsed by the Green Party of St. Paul and TakeActionMN.


BILL HOSKO – Artist and picture-framer in downtown St. Paul. States that he resides at Kellogg Square downtown. Small business booster and self-described government watchdog. Ran against Thune in 2007. Independent.


CYNTHIA SCHANNO – is an aircraft buyer and seller based at Holman Airfield. A native St. Paulite, she started as an accountant out of St. Thomas, but has flown since her teens. She was a Norm Coleman appointee to the Saint Paul Downtown Airport Taskforce. She sees the airport as an underutilized tie to city’s economic development. Independent.


SHARON ANDERSON – has been a perennial candidate for just about every office in Minnesota, and it doesn’t seem to bother her that she no longer resides in Ward 2, which should render her ineligible to vote, let alone run for the City Council seat there, which she has deone many times. Ms. Anderson continues to insist she still owns a house at 1058 Summit Ave., which everyone else insists she lost in a tax forfeiture at least 30 years ago. She continues to list that house as her official residence and no one steps forward to challenge her right to run in this ward. She is retired. Republican.





47:26 minutes (43.44 MB)

Friday, October 14, 2011

Major Fraud_ECF_Pacer_PleaseTrackUSSC10-1032_Dr.Zernik




































Thurs.13Oct2011

NEWS FLASH: HUMAN RIGHTS ALERT HAS FILED WITH THE ABA

EVIDENCE OF LARGE SCALE FRAUD RE: PASCER/ECF FILINGS.

http://www.scotusblog.com/2011/05/petition-of-the-day-118/ LandLords vs. City St.Paul,Magner et al USSC 10-1032




CITY ST.PAUL CANDIDATE SHARON ANDERSON AKA PETERSON IE: TENANTS IN COMMON AKA SCARRELLA 1ST HUSBAND

http://www.scotusblog.com/2011/05/petition-of-the-day-118/

www.taxthemax.blogspot.com www.sharon4anderson.org www.sharon4council.blogspot.com



SHARON AS A LEGAL RESEARCH ANALYST_VICTIM MAKES THIS HUMBLE PLEA TO ALSO TRACK USSC 10-1032 St.Paul City Attorneys legal counsel for Steve Magner et al employed DSI_ guilty of MS609.43 also Magner lives in Stillwater. We the TaxPaying Citizens Object to our Tax Dollars supporting City St. Paul Misconduct. www.sicko-citystpaul.blogspot.com











From: jz12345@...
To: 123456xyz@...
Sent: 10/12/2011 5:31:46 P.M. Central Daylight Time
Subj: The American Bar Association is asked to review evidence of large-scale fraud in the electronic record systems of the US courts


The American Bar Association is asked to review evidenc/e of large-scale fraud in the electronic record systems of the US courts

The evidence of large-scale fraud in the electronic record systems of the US courts has been peer-reviewed and published by computer science and criminology scholars. The US courts and the US Department of Justice refuse to address the matter. The fraud is routinely used to deprive persons of liberty and property with no due process of law, and to benefit corrupt government officers, corrupt financial institutions, and corrupt law firms through the conduct of simulated litigation.

[] []

Los Angeles, October 12 – Human Rights Alert (NGO) has filed with the American Bar Association a request for review of the evidence of large-scale fraud in the electronic records systems of the US courts (PACER and CM/ECF). [[i]] The motto of the American Bar Association is "Defending Liberty, Pursuing Justice."

The US courts and US Department of Justice have refused to address the evidence of fraud in the US courts; computer science and criminology scholars found it of merit.

Dr Zernik has previously brought the issue for review before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and before the US Supreme Court. [[ii],[iii]] The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals refused to review the matter, and the US Supreme Court “returned” the papers, which were duly filed. [[iv]]

In July 2011, William Windsor of LawlessAmerica.com and Dr Zernik filed a request with US Attorney General Eric Holder to review the integrity, or lack thereof, in the US courts’ electronic records. [[v]] The Attorney General has failed to respond.

In contrast, the evidence of large-scale fraud in the electronic records of the state and US courts has been peer-reviewed and published by computer science and criminology scholars, and presented in international computer science and criminology conferences. [[vi],[vii]]

Charade in the courts through the online publication of null and void orders and judgments

“The US courts routinely conduct simulated litigation in cases, where individual seek protection of their rights,” says Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO). [[viii]]

Simulated litigation is a charade, where the performers – judges, clerks, and attorneys – know that the court’s orders and judgments are null and void, but the parties and the public at large are deceived to believe that valid litigation is conducted pursuant to the law of the United States.

“Such fraud is probably as old as the courts themselves,” says Dr Zernik, “Over centuries, court procedures and the offices of the clerks have evolved to prevent such deceit.”

However, such safeguards were undermined, when US courts introduced their electronic record systems with no adequate public oversight. In particular, the valid form of electronic certification and authentication of court records was left vague and ambiguous.

As a result, today, the public falsely believes that any record, which is published in the online dockets of the US courts, is a valid court paper. In fact, many of the orders and judgments, which are publish online, are considered null and void by the US courts themselves. Moreover, the courts also routinely deny public access to the court’s electronic authentication records in alleged violation of First Amendment rights. [[ix]]

Unless the US courts are reformed, the US is unlikely to emerge from the current crisis.

The typical beneficiaries of the fraud in the US courts are corrupt government officers, corrupt financial institutions and large corporations, and corrupt law firms. [[x],[xi]]
“The US is in midst of a financial and constitutional crisis. There is an urgent need for reform of the US courts, if the US is to ever emerge from the current crisis,” says Dr Zernik. [[xii]] Regardless of ample evidence of criminality underlying the financial current crisis, none of the perpetrators has been convicted so far. [[xiii]]

During the Robber Baron Era (late 19th century - early 20th century) the US courts were described in the US Congress as “a burlesque and a sham.” Emerging from that period coincided with major reform of the US courts in the early 20th century. [[xiv]]

Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (NGO)
The 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations, was reviewed by the HRC professional staff and incorporated in the official HRC Professional Staff Report, with a note referring to “corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California”. [[xv]]

LINKS:

[i] 11-10-11 Seeking Review by ABA of the Electronic Record Systems of the US Courts
http://www.scribd.com/doc/68367672/
[ii] 11-01-08 Press Release: ‘Don’t Ask Don’t Tell' in the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit - Motion to Intervene, Requesting the US Court of Appeals to Dismiss the Appeals from an Uncertified Judgment, was Posted in the Docket, is Now Pending before the Court
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46528428/
[iii] 10-04-20 Motion to Intervene and related papers in Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) in the US Supreme Court
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30304657/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161573/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161636/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162109/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162144/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161692/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30185575/
[iv] 10-07-01 Complaint against US Supreme Court Counsel Danny Bickell for Alleged Public Corruption and Deprivation of Rights
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33772313/
[v] 11-07-06 Request filed by Windsor and Zernik with US Attorney General Eric Holder for Review of Integrity of Public Access and Case Management Systems of the US Courts
http://www.scribd.com/doc/59480718/
[vi] 10-08-18 Zernik, J: Data Mining as a Civic Duty – Online Public Prisoners’ Registration Systems, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining 1: 84-96 (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328591/
10-08-18 Zernik, J: Data Mining of Online Judicial Records of the Networked US Federal Courts, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining, 1:69-83 (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328585/
[vii] 11-08-01 Zernik, J: Fraud and corruption in the US courts is tightly linked to failing banking regulation and the financial crisis, 16th World Criminology Congress presentation
http://www.scribd.com/doc/61351562/
11-08-01 Zernik, J: Los Angeles Superior Court - widespread corruption and refusal of US government to take action, 16th World Criminology Congress presentation
http://www.scribd.com/doc/61351469/
[viii] Simulated Litigation here refers to cases, where the evidence shows conduct defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows:
Texas Penal Code §32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS.
(a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to:
(1) induce payment of a claim from another person; or
(2) cause another to:
(A) submit to the putative authority of the document; or
(B) take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document.
(b) Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered.
The practice is widespread in both the state and US courts at all levels.
[ix] 11-05-20 NEF (Notice of Electronic Filing) in the US Courts Electronic Filing System (CM/ECF)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/55862403/
[x] 11-10-10 Inspector General for the US Judiciary? Congress needs to start impeachments instead!
http://www.scribd.com/doc/68252366/
[xi] [1] 10-12-05 Press Release: Request for investigation, impeachment proceedings where appropriate, in re: US Judges JED RAKOFF, VIRGINIA PHILLIPS, JOHN WALTER, and US Magistrate CARLA WOEHRLE for conduct, which undermined Banking Regulation and/or Human Rights in the United States s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44671154/
[2] 10-12-04 RE: US Judges JED RAKOFF, VIRGINIA PHILLIPS, JOHN WALTER, US Magistrate CARLA WOEHRLE - Request for Investigation, Impeachment Proceedings Where Appropriate s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44669382/
[3]10-12-08 Press Release - Request for Investigation, Impeachment of RUBY KRAJICK, Clerk US District Court, Southern District of New York-s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44910959/
[4] 10-12-08 Securities and Exchange Commission v Bank of America Corporation(1:09-cv-06829) - Request for Investigation, Impeachment of RUBY KRAJICK, Clerk of the Court, US District Court, Southern District of New York s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44908376/
[5] 10-12-07 Press Release: Request for investigation, impeachment proceedings where appropriate, in re TERRY NAFISI Clerk of the US Court, Central District of California-s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44820392/
[6] 10-12-07 Request for Investigation and if Appropriate - Impeachment Proceedings - against TERRY NAFISI - Clerk of the Court, US District Court, Central District of California s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44818903/
[7] 10-12-09 Press Release: Log Cabin Republicans v United States of America et al (2:04-cv-08425) Dont Ask Dont Tell' - Clerk of the US Court asked to provide attestation records, certify the docket s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44975019/
[8] 10-12-09 Log Cabin Republicans v United States of America et al (2:04-cv-08425) - Request for Copies of Attestations by the Clerk of the Court s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44963186/
[9] 10-12-06 Log Cabin Republicans v USA (2:04-cv-08425) at the US District Court, Central District of California: Dont Ask Dont Tell
Evidence of Another Pretense Litigation by Judge Virginia Phillips
http://www.scribd.com/doc/44771304/
[10] 10-12-19 RE: Securities and Exchange Commission v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829) - Addendum to Request for Investigation-impeachment of Judge Rakoff and Clerk Krajick
http://www.scribd.com/doc/45644678/
[11] 11-01-10 Request for investigation/impeachment proceedings, in re: US Judge JED RAKOFF and Clerk RUBY KRAJICK, US District Court, Southern District of New York, Conduct of Securities and Exchange Committee v Bank of America Corporation (1:09-cv-06829) s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46616530/
[12] 11-01-25 Request for Impeachment of US Supreme Court Clerk WILLIAM SUTER s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47539382/
[13] 11-02-05 Request No 2 for Impeachment of Judge JED RAKOFF Clerk RUBY KRAJICK, US District Court, Southern District of New York, in Re Conduct of Lindner v Amex (1:10-cv-02228)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/48244479/
[14] 10-04-07 Sieverding et al v. United States Government (1:09-cv-00562) in the US District Court, Washington DC in re: Arrest and Imprisonment by Federal Agencies - Alleged Impeachable Misconduct by US Judge John D Bates
http://www.scribd.com/doc/45272251/
[15] 10-12-30 Lewis et al v Gleason et al (1:10-cv-01850) in the US District Court, Colorado Opinion Regarding PACER Docket and Court Records in a Civil Rights Matter
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46087140/
[16] 10-12-30 Press Release: Fraud on the Court Opined in Litigation in Civil Rights Matter, Presided by US Judge Christine Arguello, US District Court, Colorado (Sieverding v)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46088211/
[17] 11-05-26 PRESS RELEASE: Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, DC - willful misconduct by US Judge Richard Leon to cover up corruption of the Los Angeles courts by Countrywide and Bank of America
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56319998/
[18] 11-05-30 PRESS RELEASE: Judge Richard Leon, US District Court, DC master of the Leave to file denied
http://www.scribd.com/doc/56612919/
[19] 11-06-20 Impeachments Investigation of Judge John Walter, Magistrate Carla Woehrle, Clerk Terry Nafisi, and others in the US District Court, Central District of California, in re: Fine v State Bar (2:10-cv-00048)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/58273437/
[20] 11-07-02 Request for Impeachments US Judge O’Tool, Clerk Thornton, Both of the US District Court, Massachusetts s
http://www.scribd.com/doc/59188048/
[21] 11-07-10 Request for impeachment of US Attorney, Central District of California, ANDRE BIROTTE, Jr, for tolerating racketeering by California judges, attorneys, and others.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/59708755/
[22] 11-07-10 PRESS RELEASE: Request filed with US Congress for impeachment of US Attorney, Central District of California, ANDRE BIROTTE, Jr, for tolerating racketeering by California judges, attorneys, and others.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/59709940/
[xii] 11-06-14 Corruption of the Courts and Failing Banking Regulation in the United States: Dred Scott redux?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/57707808/
11-06-24 Time Magazine - 4th of July Issue: Does the Constitution Still Matter?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/58665806/
[xiii] 11-04-21 "In Financial Crisis, No Prosecutions of Top Figures" - Because of widespread corruption of the justice system, they are effectively immune…
http://www.scribd.com/doc/53520603/
"...a system in which only the little people have to obey the law, while the rich, and bankers especially, can cheat and defraud without consequences." Prof Paul Krugman, MIT (2011)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50753639/
[xiv] 02-00-00 Messinger, I Scott: Order in The Court - History of Clerks of United States Courts, Federal Judicial Center (2002)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/34819774/
[xv] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report, with a note referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California".
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
____
Human Rights Alert (NGO)
[]
The 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations, was reviewed by the HRC professional staff and incorporated in the official HRC Professional Staff Report, with a note referring to “corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California.”
_______
Locations of visitors to this page
Flag Counter: 126
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://inproperinla.wordpress.com/
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
Total Reads: 606,060
Followers: 1057
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://twitter.com/inproperinla
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
Total Item Views: 539,338
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERT SAY ABOUT THE CURRENT FINANCIAL CRISIS?
*
Foreclosure fraud: The homeowner nightmares continue
CNN (April 7, 2011)
*
About 3 million homes have been repossessed since the housing boom ended in 2006… That number could balloon to about 6 million by 2013
Bloomberg (January 2011)
*
"...a system in which only the little people have to obey the law, while the rich, and bankers especially, can cheat and defraud without consequences."
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50753639/
Prof Paul Krugman, MIT (2011)
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?
*
"...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."
Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
*
"This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."
Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/27433920/
* "Innocent people remain in prison"
* "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."
LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306 /
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?
*
"...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."
United Nations Human Rights Council Staff Report (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE STATE COURTS IN THE UNITED STATES?
*
"On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."
Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute (2010)
http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES?
*
"More than 100 law professors have signed on to a letter released today that proposes congressional hearings and legislation aimed at fashioning "mandatory and enforceable" ethics rules for Supreme Court justices for the first time. The effort, coordinated by the liberal Alliance for Justice, was triggered by "recent media reports," the letter said, apparently referring to stories of meetings and other potential conflicts of interest involving Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas among others."
More than 100 law professors, as reported by the Blog of the Legal Times (February 2011)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/49586436/
_____________________________
WHAT DID CHIEF JUDGE OF THE US COURT OF APPEALS, 5TH CIRCUIT, SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
*
"The American legal system has been corrupted almost beyond recognition..."
Chief Judge, US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, Edith Jones, speaking before the Federalist Society of Harvard Law School (February 2003)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50137887/
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE CHAIR OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SAY ABOUT THE US JUSTICE SYSTEM?
* In a speech in Georgetown University, Senator Leahy, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee called for a "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" on the US Department of Justice.
Transcript of Senator Leahy speech (2009)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38472251/

_____







Thu Oct 13, 2011 1:48 pm







sharon4mayor
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email























































Delete
< Prev Message Next Message >


































Expand Messages Author Sort by Date




American Bar Association asked to review evidence/Sharon_USSC10-1032
Thurs.13Oct2011 NEWS FLASH: HUMAN RIGHTS ALERT HAS FILED WITH THE ABA EVIDENCE OF LARGE SCALE FRAUD RE: PASCER/ECF FILINGS. ...
Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
sharon4mayor
Offline Send Email
Oct 13, 2011
1:51 pm








< Prev Topic Next Topic >